Additional Money For Student-Athletes? Maybe Says NCAA.

Posted: June 1, 2011 in Robert J. Romano

The NCAA and University administrators are finally opening their eyes and are willing to discussing the concept of providing student-athletes with a ‘cost of attendance’ scholarship rather than an ‘academic’ scholarship.  Cost of attendance scholarships provide for additional funding which cover an NCAA Division I athlete’s full cost of attendance—the money above and beyond just what’s paid to the university.  Athletic scholarships currently cover tuition, fees, room, board and books, but not transportation, clothing, laundry, entertainment and incidentals.

Advocates indicate that some academic scholarships cover full cost of attendance and that athletes deserve the same, especially in light of the money and exposure they bring to their schools.

But what still needs to be researched his how this concept could be implemented without inviting abuses, whether colleges afford the costs of additional funding to student-athletes, Title IX issues, and whether it would create a divide between the haves and have-nots which is already prevalent in college athletics.

NCAA President Mark Emmert and Commissioners of the six conferences have indicated that the idea of increasing the value of an athletic scholarships merits study.

One of the biggest questions is how conferences will decide whether to use a uniform dollar amount or to allow the amount estimated to be determined by each school. Per the latter, if a school provides more money for discretionary spending than another school, the first school may have a recruiting advantage.

A second will be whether football and men’s basketball players should receive extra money because their sports are the ones that produce the most revenue.  However, Title IX, the federal law that bans sex discrimination in schools, weakens such position.

The third question will be how much will it cost the colleges and schools. For those schools with 145 full scholarships, and using $3,000 as the per-athlete figure, it could cost an athletic department an extra $435,000 per year.  (This figure will be less, of course, at schools that do not have football teams.)

However, Creighton University Athletic Director Bruce Rasmussen said he’s against increasing the size of scholarships. NCAA rules allow qualifying athletes to receive need-based aid, and low-income student-athletes can receive up to $5,500 in federal Pell Grant money. Athletes also have the option of working in the summer and during the school year.

“Kids aren’t as hard up as they’d like you to believe they are,” Rasmussen said.

One question for Mr. Rasmussen: Are you for real?

Advertisements
Comments
  1. Greg Lamb says:

    Is this the NCAAs’ solution to an uncontrollable problem? I tend to side with Rasmussen; plenty of non-athletes are leaving college with debt on their shoulders from the federal government (and they are not entering the job market with a multimillion dollar professional sports contracts). Why are athletes on scholarship “exempt” from taking out a small low interest federal loan to cover expenses not paid for by their scholarship?

    What happened to responsibility? Surely NCAA coaches are teaching their players about responsibility and ethics, especially Mr. Tressel!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s